Operating intelligence and governance for the digital enterprise
XOPS maintains that as your Operating Position: one live view across the systems you already run.
Which software to renew or reclaim. Whose access to close. Which devices to replace.
Who owns every AI agent, and what it is costing you.
XOPS customers include Cencora, Corteva, S&P Global, Broadcom, and Sammons Financial.
In production at global enterprises
1.4M+ employees $4.8B IT spend 39 countries
Measured operational outcomes across pharmaceuticals, technology, agriculture, and financial services.
Start here
Your CMDB, HRIS, identity, endpoint, procurement, contract and finance systems each hold evidence. None of them maintains the decision-ready position across them, so the evidence stops short of the decision and a person carries it the rest of the way.
If a decision triggers a cross-functional evidence hunt,
your enterprise doesn't maintain its position.
It reconstructs it.
That reconstruction has been normalised as operations. It isn't operations. It's overhead.
XOPS replaces that reconstruction with a continuously maintained Position,
and governed action that does not wait for someone to reassemble the facts.
The reconstruction is what gets replaced. Not the systems. ServiceNow, Workday, Coupa, Okta, your endpoint and FinOps tooling and the CMDB all stay exactly where they are, each still authoritative for what it genuinely knows.
The Position
A CMDB records an IT view. A workflow runs a defined process. Neither maintains this.
Two workforces, counted the same way.
A person is one worker. An agent burning $2,480 a month is another. Both get an accountable owner, a policy, a budget and a lifecycle that ends.
No invented people. No dropped dollars.
Every unit of consumption resolves to a person or an agent, or is held visible as unresolved. XOPS will show you a gap before it guesses an owner.
That is the shape of it. The artifact itself is worth auditing: every fact about one real person, the systems that contributed to it, how a contradiction between two of them resolves, and what executes next. See the full Position →
How it operates
Most systems report the gap inside their own domain. This is the loop that closes it across all of them.
A tool tells you the gap exists.
An operating architecture is told what should be true, and closes it.
AI explores and recommends above the line. People set the policy and approve the exceptions. XOPS executes deterministically below it, and no model sits in the execution path. The full control logic →
In production
89 → 1
Fortune 15 pharmaceutical
Onboarding a contractor used to take the equivalent of 89 roles.
Now it runs as a report, watched by one part-time operator.
Roughly 92% of the lifecycle work completes with no human intervention. The remaining 8% is exception work, which is where that operator now spends their time. Reported production result, measured in the customer's own environment.
“We didn't replace a single system. We declared the end state. The engine ran on the stack we already had.”
$20M
Annual contracting spend removed by running IT without the systems integrator.
Fortune 250 agrochemical · measured
$4.3M/yr
Saved by replacing laptops when telemetry says they are failing, not when the calendar says they are old.
Fortune 100 technology · measured
40%
Software license spend reduced, after one unified view of entitlement, usage and ownership exposed systematic over-licensing across major contracts.
Fortune 250 financial · measured
Four production deployments. Every figure above was measured in the customer's own environment, not modelled and not a pilot. Publisher-mandated measurement tooling is consumed, not replaced. Named references available under NDA.
What adoption looks like
Connect existing systems once
Read what they already publish. No new agent on the endpoint.
Scope it to one outcome
Measured against criteria you set, alongside the security review and integration work any enterprise change carries.
Govern actions from day one
Policy-bound and approval-gated before anything executes.
Add outcomes as priorities change
The same Position carries software, devices, employee lifecycle, procurement, FinOps and AI. The second outcome costs a fraction of the first.
Preserve source-system authority
Every system stays authoritative for what it genuinely knows.
Build on what you own
ServiceNow, Workday, identity, endpoint, procurement, FinOps and security, all worth more once reconciled.
The invitation
A renewal you are walking into blind. A leaver nobody fully closed. A refresh cycle you cannot defend. An agent spending money in a departed employee's name.
We will map the Position behind it against the systems you already run, and measure one outcome. Not a slide about your industry. Your estate, your evidence, your gaps, including the ones we cannot resolve.
No rip-and-replace. Start with one decision and the systems already behind it.
Ninety minutes to map the Position. A short proof of value to measure the outcome, once system access and security review are complete.
Not ready to bring us one yet? Start with a briefing
If you would rather start with the architecture
